Limitation periods are a public interest consideration in the legal system which seeks to weigh a person’s right to sue with a person’s right not to have potential legal claims held over them indefinitely.

Must an insurer must provide liability coverage for bodily injury caused by an insured who pled guilty to a criminal offense that caused the injury?

In Busato, Gore denied the claim due to the fact that the appellant had grown approximately 25 marijuana plants.

Trotter and Morton Limited v Biegel, 2024 ABCA 312 is a case of interest with respect to what factual issues can be dealt with on summary judgment versus what requires a trial.

This case serves as a cautionary tale to insurers and as a reminder of their duty of good faith.

Norris v Vomacka represents the first opportunity for the Alberta Courts to consider the new “three-expert rule” implemented by Bill 41.

Following the ruling in Artindale-Eeles v Mercer, 2024 ABKB 233, credibility continues to be a significant factor in subjective chronic pain cases.

The recent medical malpractice case of Khaleel v. Indar, 2024 ABKB 203, acts as a good reminder in respect of costs and Calderbank Offers.